I'm not sure how you expect me to respond to this.

I continue to work with bitqyck because I make recommendations, and they have established a pattern in the last couple of months of following them. I don't know what's in their heart, but I know what my intentions are. As I said, I'm not invested in bitqy, not because I don't think it has no potential, but because I want to avoid any appearance of impropriety.

We're in a phase of blockchain development where, yes, there is still fertile ground for innovation, but there has been paved a way for application and distribution of existing refined technologies. Bitqyck largely falls into that latter category. Creating a rewards token isn't hugely innovative, and neither is using a blockchain to secure ownership in a corporation, but it is a smart application of the technology, and it introduces a layer of transparency to corporate governance that (and the bitqyck guys may not like me saying this publicly) has historically been lacking in many network marketing organizations through modern history.

I see a proper application of blockchain technology to this effort as a (yes, lucrative) path to algorithmically enforcing business ethics. This is a vision the founders of bitqyck have, at least to me, have expressed strong agreement with.