I don't understand the 51% problem...if the owner of btcguild can be trusted with all that btc to give out to miners and to be honest n stuff...and has great security measures...who cares how big it gets...course all the ppl will do then is just spread FUD bout btcguild gonna do a 51% attack blah blah
18078 2013-05-17 21:59:35 2:25:00 20411945 1951 0.00001476 236670 25.11154300
18077 2013-05-17 19:34:35 2:27:43 20693673 2462 0.00268799 236657 25.12165813
Nearly identical round time. Nearly identical shares. 5.49% reward. I don't care how much cheating is being prevented by the score system, you can't convince me this isn't pure bull.
I'm going to BTCGuild.
Later Slush.
It is a 20% difference in shares. You had some problems in 19078. And if they were on the end of the round you are on a loosing side of this. But if there were on the start you would get about the same as for 18077. This is just a way it is with Slush method. Unless you are saying that you were mining all the time and you did monitor it or log it and you didn't see any brakes in mining.
P.S.: You are not big but BTC Guild has 51% problems. Consider any other pool to help them out.