I don't care about the lower hashrate/payouts, but it's not really "fair" when linux get 2x hashrate on the same hardware. Just wanted to know why 
Guys- Its not getting ignored- we were moving like a steamroller until F7000 hit, and the issue is things have to be prioritized.
Its a higher priority to address Prod issues than "hashrate" issues.
Now it appears the pool is running again without issues so now I can take a look at the hash rate issues across OS.
The pool is storing the OS flavor per miner now, so I should be able to go in and write a report of average speed per OS flavor.
I do see that windows appears to hash at a much slower rate than linux for some reason.
Im seeing 34,000 HPS on my vultr-debian vs 4,000 on my dual CPU xeon windows web server. Quite a disparity there. Definitely unintentional from our engineering standpoint.
Yeah im not asking you to magically fix it over night, just look into it. Thanks
And first devs answer was "7000k"?!?!?
Really after 4 days mentioning this on this thread!?! REALLY!?!?! Problem devs created 8 HOURS ago not 8 DAYS.