So in reviewing granatgas-pool:

10 different miners yielding **269 GH/s** on easy blocks (<3000 difficulty) that switch in for 5-30 mins based on next block low difficulty, or switch out based on next block high difficulty caused by the MASSIVE hashpower. That is .25 TH/s being thrown in at will to maximize DAS blocks for max mining rewards. Compared to the regular 30-40 GH/s provided consistently by all other mining sources? Damn!!

There is NO way to compete with nor dilute that hashpower within reason. 269/309=87% hashpower in the hands of ONE autoswitching multipool. It would take the DAS community and consistent miners of DAS to bring to bear a min of 300 GH/s to hold a 51% mining. The x11 multipool there has up to 1.2 TH/s to bring to bear against all or one coin in their pool. That is the world of x11 ASICs.

I just hope the other pools are mining consistently, but I don't think so. EVERY time there is a difficult block over 5000 when I'm mining, I am the ONLY one who solves the block. ("breaks the block").

That is just rough. But that is one of the cons of an x11 single algo coin and the x11 ASICS now out there. Dash has a HUGE network, higher difficulty, with a lot of Dash in circulation at a high value with expensive masternodes= that's their protection). DAS = "same" system but very LOW cost, MUCH lower difficulty, low circulation, high mining possibility and easily exchangeable to BTC for immediate profit = no protection. (Why Vivo went neoscrypt? A little overboard on mining power/costs needed, IMHO)

Take it up the port from the ASICs? Or change something down the road to protect the integrity and reliability of DAS?

Regards,

c_p