I read through (scanned) a lot of posts, so forgive me if this has been brought up. If CombiCoin where asked to differentiate themselves from Bitquence at this point in time, what would be the key points where the two differ to a great degree ?
Second, in the future it seems Bitquence would likely be interested in focused development of a system like this as a feature of their coin.
Lastly, have CombiCoin and Bitquence ever had an exchange of words ? The two projects seem very much complimentary, it seems to me larger gains could be had with CombiCoin "Combined" with Bitquence.
I know nobody wants to hear all that with all the high energy and excitement, as well as a very successful round of fundraising, so everything aside, I wish you guys well..It's a great idea in it's user facing simplicity and backend complexity.
SereneticElectrons
Im not too familiar with bitquence but from looking at it quickly it seems like another diversification option, where they simply take your investment (ETH) and split it between several accounts with various alts via the universal wallet
In a few of their infographs they are comparing themselves to Ledger Nano S, Trezor and such which to mean means there positioning themselves as more of a universal wallet then what combicoin is.
I also couldnt find if they have something like the TRIA token for dividends but it doesnt seem like it