If you are going to leverage familiarity you better make sure your source is the right one. From that perspective it would be good, for instance, to use some kind of coin or circle as a backdrop. That way it will be clear to a lot of people that this is a currency.
because of course a circle is a currency right? - Like that huge retarded
B is a currency is it? , you know the man on the street wouldn't have a clue, you show them that B they are going to start thinking Rumpa Room or PlaySchool.
That is the established pattern, yes. And it was just an example.
In any case, it's better than a bird that is associated with a social media.
Seriously, this logo sucks, don't get protective over it. If anything, just delete it and start afresh.
Keywords:
-thing
-movable
-valuable
Actually i like it , i understand you disagree - the more i look at it the more i like this , you don't have to like it, submit one yourself friend. - i'm not protective it literally took me about 20 munites work. - have you seen the OP page?
Aah, so because noone really reacts positively to your logo you come with the 'but I, the designer, think its good!' reasoning.
How unexpected..
Usually, when a design is good you don't have to tell people you think it's good. They will see its good on their own.
I think you need to re-think why you accused me of hating altcoins on basis of not liking your design.
You are blinded so hard by your own farts that you think that people who critisize your design cannot have done so because of the design and so they must have had other reasons.