Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | PARAGON | Revolutionizing the Cannabis Industry |
by
sockpuppet1911
on 24/09/2017, 09:51:16 UTC
With or without celebrity involved in an ICO, if the managing team behind knows how to market their own project no doubt it will easily funded. Previous ICOs like Tezos, NEO and OmiseGO were never endorsed by any celebrity but all them have a very successful crowdfunding campaign.
Celebrities involved in an ICO are a plus.
However, this is better than without any celebrities involved.

celebrities just bring in speculative short term investors, not real investors that hodl

Celebrities won't make experience investors buy more, that is only for the common people, or the ones that like said celebrity, there are always people that will invest only in it, so why not have them? it won't damage the project, jut doesn't put a bad one, that can be really shameful.

Public figure like celebrity could give a positive impact to an ICO but not always. It's just a plus value to ICO.  When a celebrity involved in a project, it can give more confident to some people.

I think approach will be a standard in icos of the future, it makes sense when you think about it, they are tweeting to millions of fans that are listening, probably good thing for the cryptocurrency as whole.