Tried, convicted, spent 14 months in jail, and is still on probation.
A bit more than an IRS witch hunt.
I'd generally let something like this slide if it was a long time ago and has nothing to do with what someone is doing now. For instance, if he ran a mail fraud 20 years ago and is now accused of robbing a bank, it isn't all that relevant.
However, when someone is running what looks awfully like the very mail fraud they were recently in prison for perpetrating, I am less inclined to cut slack and more inclined to think a leopard doesn't change its spots.
Hang on, let me get this straight, you'd be prepared to cut the guy some slack *if* he committed an armed bank robbery?!
You're cool with that...but mail fraud is out of order??...