Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: BFL Forced "On Hold For Refund" for all my Single SC orders
by
k9quaint
on 21/05/2013, 04:09:08 UTC

Eaten at a 4 star restaurant? Yes, I have, actually. No idea what that's got to do with anything, but then again, you're an imbecile.

An inditement isn't actual evidence. It's just assertions made by the prosecuting side, who (in case you don't know) often make all sorts of baseless accusations and twistings of the truth in order to make their case. Like cops who charge people with "assault" for pulling away when they grab them, or "resisting arrest" for not bleeding enough when they get their faces slammed into the pavement.

I've read through plenty of legal documents in my time, and I know damn good and well that they're usually about 90% bullshit and 10% fluff...

It's possible that the charges were actually legit, but once again, they have precious little to do with this thread. But people with an ax to grind are hell bent on spreading FUD.

Now piss off. Those windows aren't gonna lick themselves!

The 4 star restaurant line was in regards to an earlier claim by a BFL groupie that he/she had eaten at a Michelin 4 star restaurant. Are you claiming that you have eaten at a Michelin 4 star restaurant?

It is spelled indictment oh great reader of plenty legal documents.

You said the IRS indicted him. I was correcting yet another of your misrepresentations. The indictment was signed by 5 US district attorneys, including the chief of the major frauds section and the chief of the criminal division.

He was not just indicted. He was convicted and served time in prison. He had to consent to "not engage, as whole or partial owner, employee or otherwise, in any business involving loan programs, gambling or gaming activities, telemarketing activities, investment programs or any other business involving the solicitation of funds or cold-calls to customers" as a condition of his probation (which he is still on).

The criminal history of the president of BFL is very relevant to this thread. I understand you wish people would stop talking about it. It has to be inconvenient for you to have to defend someone who stole millions of dollars from thousands of retired senior citizens.