Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
I strongly support active contributors to LISK and prefer voting them over profit sharing only delegates. However, let be transparent, fair and accountable. Don't be too greedy and see voters as idiots
Dear voters,
Let raise your voice and ask delegates for increasing their profit sharing ratio to at least 50% and consider unvoting the following delegates
+ corsaro: 10% share only
+ tembo: 15% share only
+ mrv: 5% share only
+ redsn0w: 10% share only
+ splatters: 10% share only
+ joel: 15%
+ dakk: 15%
+ 4miners.net: 0%
+ cc001: 0%
+ digitron: 0%
+ hmachado: 0%
+ grumlin: 0%
+ goldeneye: 0%
+ liskgate: 0%
+ punkrock: 0%
+ gr33ndrag0n: 0%
It is a waste of money and time to vote for delegates that share nothing to voters. It is simply too greedy
All of them are from GDTPool
Also, vote for techbytes because he shares 90% reward https://lisk.cryptopools.com
Delegate owners please contact http://earnlisk.com/ owner to update your profit sharing ratio
Dear voters,
Let raise your voice and ask delegates for increasing their profit sharing ratio to at least 50% and consider unvoting the following delegates
+ corsaro: 10% share only
+ tembo: 15% share only
+ mrv: 5% share only
+ redsn0w: 10% share only
+ splatters: 10% share only
+ joel: 15%
+ dakk: 15%
+ 4miners.net: 0%
+ cc001: 0%
+ digitron: 0%
+ hmachado: 0%
+ grumlin: 0%
+ goldeneye: 0%
+ liskgate: 0%
+ punkrock: 0%
+ gr33ndrag0n: 0%
It is a waste of money and time to vote for delegates that share nothing to voters. It is simply too greedy
All of them are from GDTPool
Also, vote for techbytes because he shares 90% reward https://lisk.cryptopools.com
Delegate owners please contact http://earnlisk.com/ owner to update your profit sharing ratio
You say "I strongly support active contributors to LISK and prefer voting them over profit sharing only delegates", but you are telling people to unvote active contributors to lisk like myself that has been closing Github issues at lisk's beginning, providing lisktools.io (which does need to be updated, but waiting for Lisk 1.0 with new API), and providing the Lisk Android Wallet https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mrv.liskgdt.wallet
or gr33ndrag0n is bad even though he has been the one providing the most reliable snapshots for everyone, makes sure snapshots work with new lisk releases, and has provided alternate wallets and explorer sine the beginning?
or hmachado is bad even though he has provided liskak for all delegates to keep their nodes running smoothly
or 4miners.net is bad even though he has provided great new explorer features and has contributed to closing GitHub issues.
or cc001 who HQ has thought it a good enough delegate that they made a lisk.chat moderator, helping countless new people in chat and has provided many tutorials and guides in the forums.
And instead
You ask people to vote for a profit sharing only delegate that is openly selling the Lisk they keep and providing nothing for Lisk except a pool delegate.
I also find it interesting that you are only asking to unvote GDT members and community contributors; when there is another person in the top 101 that is running 2 delegates and sharing nothing with one of them while providing nothing for Lisk except the other delegate which is a pool. Hmm....
Edit: I missed that you said Don't be too greedy and see voters as idiots. You say this but then tell everyone to vote for a delegate sold all the forged lisk that they set aside for app development for personal gains; and admits to just selling the 50% they weren't sharing with voters; again for presumably just personal gains since they aren't contributing to the Lisk community anymore.
Edit 2: If you want a 90% pool vote in, wouldn't it make more sense to vote gdtpool instead of techbytes? techbytes has a history of just selling what lisk they can for their own profits. gdtpool says they will use the 10% not shared to fund and donate to Lisk development projects. Also, the gdtpool excludes all GDT members so more goes back commuity voters. Again, this makes your points very interesting....