Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ICO] [NaPoleonX] 1st 🌟French🌟 algorithmic crypto asset manager 🚀
by
chaoscoinz
on 28/09/2017, 02:19:19 UTC
Quote from: Elkmar on September 23, 2017, 09:42:56 PM
Quote from: Heimer on September 23, 2017, 09:27:05 PM
Quote from: Elkmar on September 23, 2017, 08:50:53 PM
Quote from: johny08 on September 23, 2017, 06:22:14 PM
Quote from: ParRus on September 23, 2017, 06:14:22 PM
Quote from: Departure on September 23, 2017, 05:05:28 PM
Quote from: belechau on September 23, 2017, 04:34:55 PM
Quote from: dimifi on September 12, 2017, 09:21:51 PM
Just yeasterday i was sugested to fallow this project when i asked my telegram frieds about huge future projects Cheesy its glad to have u guys at bitcointalk ! Smiley i liked the idea to make bots accessable for more ppl, this will scale the disbalance which is effecting markets now Smiley Will try to share my thoughts more when i digest the white paper

Every day more eager for the real use of this project and its algorithms, my losses increase every day in my investments and purchase orders, I hope to use your Bots soon and increase my earnings. Following

I have the same problem. I try to trade on the exchange on my own, I constantly get losses and disappointments. I want to try to work through bots.
bot is better - he trades by a well-defined algorithm, but human is passionate  - something went wrong as expected - it gives in to panic, and makes mistake , for this reason this project will be very useful

algorithm can just support a trader or your algorithm is an AI from the future big data and neuro learning feature. the positive aspect of using emotions in trading is called intuition.

Well, there is no really such thing as intuition.

Everything is based in previous experience, intuition is just a thing that recall you a previous experience and you judge the outcome superior to the risk taken.

So, trading bot backed by neural network would be surely way better than human. It just need the technology to study all the source of information a human has access to.
I don't remember his name but there was a Russian chess player who beat best computer with best AI. I know that this was a long time ago but still it's a good example. My biggest motivation is that Napoleon will trade without me so I can do other things  Cool

I think it was a loss. There is no way to win against computer on chess now, they can calculate every possible outcomes in less than a second, a human is nothing in compareason.

In fact, the guy you re reffering too is kasparoff, and it was in 1997. He won the first match and loosed the second.
The innovation of A.I always starts of with relatively small achievements, and as it's intelligence progresses, it gets better and better at every task it's given. Today it may be just a game of chess. Tommorow it will be someones job, someones livelihood.
   I'm all for human ingenuity, but I think that todays automatons, are growing increasingly intelligent, and that means that they are also becoming equally as dangerous. So, I sit somewhere in the between the two extremes, when it comes to automation, and human perseverance. On one hand, it improves our lives by taking care of difficulties we face everyday, usually over simplifying the process, all the while, providing excellent efficiency (often better than a human could). On the other hand, you have the Luddites (people who are simply terrified of technology), who are afraid that the A.I will rise up and destroy us all.