... I do not understand why many write "thank you for the work," "it will not be easy" and that kind of crap ... 
If we use the program from mr. Claymore and do not specify the "-nofee 1" option, we become mr. Claymore's clients and pay him a 2% fee (ex. SSL conn...etc).
I think Mr. Claymore should tell us "thank you" ...? Right?
I, as an active mr. Claymor's client, have a number of questions for mr. Claymore:
1. How to verify the reliability of 2% of your rewards? Real indicators are 10% or even 15%. The information is taken from the number of allocated shares on the pool and the indicators of the miner.
2. Why when I specify the option "-nofee 1" does your program report that some optimizations are disabled? And how does disabling optimizations relate to your reward? Why?
3. How does the "-h" parameter affect performance? Your measurements, recomendations?
4. Comments on the following message when your program is running:
cannot find block data:
{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}}
cannot convert blob data
How does this affect performance? Is the action accepted?
5. Will there be comments to the comparisons of the performance of your miner and other's?
Yes, we have to thank him for is great work. With his miner I get a 10% higher hashrate on some cards. Donating him 2% gives me still 8% more profit. You don't have to use his miner! Just be a dick, take the stak miner source code, remove the fees and compile it yourself.If we use the program from mr. Claymore and do not specify the "-nofee 1" option, we become mr. Claymore's clients and pay him a 2% fee (ex. SSL conn...etc).
I think Mr. Claymore should tell us "thank you" ...? Right?
I, as an active mr. Claymor's client, have a number of questions for mr. Claymore:
1. How to verify the reliability of 2% of your rewards? Real indicators are 10% or even 15%. The information is taken from the number of allocated shares on the pool and the indicators of the miner.
2. Why when I specify the option "-nofee 1" does your program report that some optimizations are disabled? And how does disabling optimizations relate to your reward? Why?
3. How does the "-h" parameter affect performance? Your measurements, recomendations?
4. Comments on the following message when your program is running:
cannot find block data:
{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}}
cannot convert blob data
How does this affect performance? Is the action accepted?
5. Will there be comments to the comparisons of the performance of your miner and other's?
As already explained, it's not 2% of the shares, it's 2% of your mining time. Take a stopwatch and measure the time, the miner uses for dev-fees and the time it's mining for you.
Excuse me, I did not go on insults ...
At the expense of time or shares ... think about it - 2% of the time gives a reduction of shares at 10..15% ... funny you.
The questions are clearly not for you.
Questions on the merits.
Your questions are not new, all of them.
1. It's a very good idea to read FAQ in the first post of this thread. If you really think that I take 10-15% of your hashrate - don't use my miners. If you want to share this "news" here: show some proofs at least, the miner writes detailed log file and you can examine it if you have some basic knowledge about pool mining.
2. Because my miner is not free. If you want me to lose 100% earnings from you, I want you to lose a few percents of your earnings too. You always can use open-source miners if you think that you will earn more or if they are more convenient for you.
3. Miner selects best "-h" value automatically. If you think that you can find better value, you can try to do it.
4. The reason depends on pool, may be it was stale share, or GPU found solution incorrectly, you can find more details in the log file. You lost this share anyway.
5. I don't understand why you wait these comparisons from me, you should do it yourself to find the best miner for you.