Oh, this is so interesting. In this thread you can refer to the info, and find the answer to your question. But in the Scientific proof that God exists? you can quote my post, and then ask a question that is answered right in my post that you just quoted, totally playing the game like the answer isn't there.
You are such a game player!
What's interesting is how dishonest you are. Your starting point is assuming god exists and you try to prove his existence desperately although no real science man agrees with anything you say.
God ultimately is beyond science. Knowledge of the infinite lies at a deeper more fundamental level.
All knowledge traces back ultimately to apriori truth.
If you deny the infinite you must choose different typically nihilistic apriori. These assumptions in turn warp and fundamentally alter ones relationship with the universe.
The only dishonesty I have seen is a refusal to follow logic to its rational conclusion. Many people who deny God seem to exhibit this dishonesty of self settling into a childlike refusal to think following delivery of some smug barb about fairytales or spaghetti monsters.
It is my opinion that rejection of God is ultimately not compatible with sustained existence in homo sapiens on a multigenerational timeline.
Proverbs 14:27
The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, turning a person from the snares of death.