Thanks, just asking to think about what you say before you say it and the effect it can have on the community, especially given the size of the pools you are operating.  To be honest with you, of all the pools that miners have been the most concerned about, it has been yours.  Not trying to be too harsh, but your decision to split your pools into 2 and continue to accept new hash power on the same subnet was very irresponsible and bad for the blockchain so early in it's life.  This is why major pools on other coins open up their second servers on the other side of the world, to help spread the hash out and prevent forks.  One could argue that the forking problem we're concerned about isn't just due to the coin's nature, or the bad luck of the other pools, but an issue with the way you've ran your pool from the early age of the blockchain, with at times having up to 60-70% of the entire network hash parked.  It's very important for pool operators and miners to consider the consequences of their actions so early in a new coins existence.