Okay Guys,
Let's conclude this part of the thread:
Please don't take this personally but as constructive criticism. It's obvious you're a coder and not in management yet because you've failed to acknowledge/identify a couple of key problems (should have been the first step)....just helpful advice when you're trying to move up the chain in the future.
In regards to your plan - I've read pages now and still have no solid Idea on how you propose to deal with the following problems:
1. Implementation - Just because a lot of money goes behind an idea, doesn't mean that its; A - Good for Bitcoin, B - Accepted by a majority, C -A clear priority. There's a reason the lobby and vote system exists in government and despite anarchist opinion, it's not to promote corruption... its to create an educated and well balanced debate that addresses all sides before a vote is cast on implementation.....how does your plan get to implementation in a fair and organized way?
2. Government Intervention - How do you plan to protect Bitcoin from this looming threat. I caution you that - "the we have more computing power than they do so what can they do" argument is painfully flawed. When were talking about governments the size of the US, China, Russia, etc.... the paltry market cap of Bitcoin could easily be squashed by a multitude of options. You need to acknowledge that this is a REALITY and then give us a plan that will address it. Throwing money at developers does not satisfactorily re-enforce Bitcoin. This war isn't going to be solely waged by computers over the internet in the near future....its going to face real push-back and sanctions from governments if we're not careful and it will affect us all.