Well there hasn't been any statements in regards to ICOs, just regular cryptocurrencies so I don't know where are you basing your thoughts about ICOs. Also, that's just two days from now so we're still not sure whether China will reconsider their decisions that fast, though they're notoriously known to change their rulings in an instant.
If this is true though then what happened in China rumors and bans were just an orchestrated FUD by the Chinese officials and investors.
If this is true though then what happened in China rumors and bans were just an orchestrated FUD by the Chinese officials and investors.
Wow, are you a real pajeet? Pajeets are stupid like you, I dont know anyone that stupid to think there is September 31 like the article says.
October 1 in China is in 40 minutes, not 2 days, pajeet.
A typo error, but my argument still stands: their stance against ICOs wouldn't change, but trading cryptocurrencies would be regulated and not be banned as opposed to their initial statements. And I'm not a pajeet, not even an Indian so I don't know why you're too butthurt when someone pointed out something that doesn't exist. Next time, try to read everything carefully before trying to shill out the coins that you support.
