The WSJournal article says if BTC is to change dollar, its current value is 0. Plus the ways of possible transactions with BTC is very limited and it requires spending lots of energy (who can explain the part with the energy spending?).
On the other hand if in future BTC would depend on gold, its value will be stable and it won't be opened to any fluctuations at all.
What do you guys think about that?
WSJ is known for click-baits and senseless contents, it's not a surprise they would make something like this. The value of bitcoin will not depend on gold, rather on the market(supply and demand) alone. Though it is not that stable because it can increase and decrease by huge amounts in a very short time, but that's the point of being volatile.