Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
I really do not understand why the "core team" has a 2X problem.
Without 2X is not Segwit. Bitcoin has exponential support, so 2X is a good compromise.
... ok I understand that they want to create a "market fee" and "birth of side chains" as soon as possible.
The war between Bitcoin and Segwit2x will damage both sides and finally 2X is necessary (only the of time question)
Without 2X is not Segwit. Bitcoin has exponential support, so 2X is a good compromise.
... ok I understand that they want to create a "market fee" and "birth of side chains" as soon as possible.
The war between Bitcoin and Segwit2x will damage both sides and finally 2X is necessary (only the of time question)
You are full of shit.
You assume the conclusion to your logical puzzle. Don't know why core is against, 2x, 2x is necessary.. blah blah blah...
No 2x is not necessary. There is absolutely no reason for 2x, except the fact that various folks (including you) are making up facts and conclusions in order to assert that 2x is necessary, when it is clearly not.
2x is only being propositioned as being necessary in order to make attacks upon THE REAL bitcoin.
You know that, but you are just coming into this thread and making nonsensical points and assuming the conclusion that you want to reach (and you hope others will reach your nonsense too..... like they do in r/btc... and.. makes NO sense.
before i thought 2mb blocks were a good compromise ...now after the august events it's really is not. maybe someday yes but for now it appears the current parameters are fine as is ~ i feel the original troll of x2 was to undermine the LN team...
I never really did believe that 2x was justified at any point; however, i agreed with your point that 2x could be a decent and good and warranted plan in the future, if necessary.
One additional thing that happened with the renegade Bcash fork is that it should be strongly considered these fuck-job forkers pretty much took over the whole bitcoin space with their bullshit, and pretty much negated any kind of good faith that might have been read into some of the supposed segwit2x (NYA) signatories....
Anyhow, that segwit2x agreement should be pretty much considered to be null and void because the terms no longer apply, in part based on the renagade bcash hardfork - and further another reason (but a little weaker, but legit nonetheless) for segwit2x agreement to be null and void is that empirical evidence pretty much shows that the 2x part of segwit2x is not really justified - and therefore any segwit2x agreement was somewhat reasoned on actual necessity and justification rather than just blindly implementing (as several whiner nutjobs frequently falsely proclaim that there was some locking in without any need for further justification)