your goals to sabotage and to overturn and to make bitcoin easier to change... you hope to get your ways by deceiving people that you actually have valid goals and that is why you are posting your nonsense
...aaand you're back to your personally-comfortable position of ascribing to others motivations that are not only completely wrong, but also utterly unknowable by you anyhow.
I have a pretty decent idea of your motivations, we have been having various interactions in these BCT forum threads for nearly a couple of years... you have been ascribing to various big blocker nonsense during much of that time in spite of a few intermittent lucid moments that you might share with us.
Rather than employ reason against my assertions. This is what substitutes for logic in the JJG world. So much easier than defending your pronouncements, isn't it?
I don't know about that. If we are starting from different premises, then all the logic in the world is not going to help.
My statements about the time it would take to onboard the world at 1MB are clear above.
Irrelevant speculation.
How many folk do you believe are on bitcoin, currently, maybe .1%. How many want to get on, perhaps 1%.. We gotta long fucking way to go before we would get from 1% to 100%, and likely systems are going to evolve as more people want to onboard... so you are creating some kind of artificial problem that currently does not exist in order that you can be right about some problem that does not exist... I am failing to understand how exactly the onboarding of 100% of the world is relevant at this particular moment of BTC's development - so maybe the burden is on you to show how that supposed problem (that you made up from real facts and logic) is relevant, exactly.
If you want to tell me they are incorrect, then show me where I am wrong.
Why would I have any burden to show you facts or logic about a speculative scenario that you made up (and maybe something that is 30 years into the future) as if it were somehow relevant about a conversation about issues in front of bitcoin today?
Or are you incapable of the elementary arithmetic required to do the calculation yourself? Need handholding?
You don't really mean this do you? You really think that we are talking about something that boils down to basic math? So yeah, you are presenting a supposed issue that does not really exist because the essence of our disagreement does not have much of anything to do with basic math, right?
I mean really.... Can you at least agree that we are somewhere on the lower end of a fraction of a percentage of world adoption, and just imagine first of all getting to a point of 1% adoption might take some time.
If there are 7 billion people in the world, then 1% would be 70 million using bitcoin in some kind of way... Are we even close to that? Are we even close to half of that, I have my doubts. So probably we should be figuring out scenarios involving these kinds of more realistic numbers rather than suggesting some fantastical numbers involving anywhere close to 7 billion people.