chryspano, if you would like to have video or Slack debate about DPoS, lets do it! Stop hiding behind personal attacks please.
Cut the crap and go find Dan at the eos telegram, he is often there answering questions.
Ive tried having debates in non-neutral settings before and what happens is when I start winning the debate, suddenly I am censored.
So again I will offer to debate you in a neutral setting.
Do not worry too much about your irrationality on display here, as this is already buried on
page 34 of this thread and soon your irrelevant personal attacks will be buried in dozens upon dozens of more pages of the shilling of this scam. Yet
reply #666 remains mine, purely by the choice of Satan (or luck?).
I think we are done. Do cut the crap and let me know if you or Dan or whomever wants to have a debate in a neutral setting.
We can debate the technological side and also
the issue of Dans scamming, where he
premeditated an intent to obfuscate the securities he was issuing. Be nice to get down into it nitty gritty on video. That could be fun!
Dan may actually enjoy developing things. He may actually be a legitimate developer of technology. But somehow he manages to mix that with sophisticated attempts to obfuscate the reality of his presumably illegal activities as linked above. And now the EOS token sale is over the top in terms of raising far too much money and afaik not enforcing KYC and attempting to claim Regulation S exemption without doing KYC.
Disclaimer: same as what I wrote before.