However since you don't even understand entropy correctly, your assumptions can't be scientifically correct.
Actually, it's that you don't quite understand science correctly.
There are two parts to science:
1. That which is readily known;
2. Theory, which isn't readily known, although it may come close at times.
The part of entropy that you are talking about is theory.
The part of entropy that I am talking about is readily known.
Your problem is that you constantly try to imply that entropy theory is readily known to be fact, when it is not. Consider your stupid idea that the beginning happens over and over. Such an idea belongs to the realm of science fiction. There is no basis in fact for it, even though scientifically speaking, it might happen. Maybe the moon is made of green cheese, and all the tests of moon rocks are flawed in some way. Could happen, but not likely by a long shot.
''Such an idea belongs to the realm of science fiction. There is no basis in fact for it'' You mean God?
You simply didn't understand entropy correctly. You think that evolution can't happen because of entropy which again is simply wrong, evolution does not violate any scientific law. You also think people can't get smarter or we can't advance because of entropy which is again just plain wrong and there is plenty of evidence that we can indeed advance.
''The part of entropy that I am talking about is readily known.'' You mean wrong? Just admit that you didn't understand entropy correctly lol, stop being so pathetic.