Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 07, 2017, 02:43:11 AM

Quote from: Torque on October 07, 2017, 02:28:26 AM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on October 07, 2017, 02:23:17 AM

Torque, what exactly is your thesis here? Because there are real dead people there.

That real people don't die, or can't die, in a false flag event is a fallacy. They can and they do.

But does that justify lying to the people about the event itself, or the details of the event? Does that justify the police changing their story a half dozen times? Does that justify using crisis actors (fact and proven)? Does that justify fabricating the number of actual wounded and/or the dead?

Are you fkn kidding me if I even have to devise a 'thesis' on this shit because some people might have died? And truthfully, how would we even know? Because of a friend-of a friend-of a neighbor-of a co-worker-of a stranger online says that they have a family member who died?

I know there's a lot of misinformation about it, and a lot of people seem to be using the event to spin for their team. But false flag is a fkn bold claim. Unless you write for the Daily Stormer, I expect a bit more to back it up.

It could just as easily have been somebody paid the guy to do it to boost gun stalks. There's just not enough reliable information available to form a sensible conclusion.

False flag

1) Facts in media within 24 hours they told you what happened

2) Facts do not match

3) Fake news, new conspiracies

Fasle flag effective

next story