Whether you are a chronic or habitual offender is of little importance.
Stating that there's almost no difference between single time criminal offender and a chronic just shows your lack of education and your bullshit. Keep drinking the kool-aid, but that ain't gonna help you get a better degree than high school. 
Classic argumentum ad hominem. Playing stupid on purpose, are we?
It is indeed of little importance whether you are a habitual or chronic criminal as the point is that you, 'LaudaM', are a proven extortionist (criminal). What sort of offender is important regarding your prosecution only, not regarding the issue or argument.