Thank you for proving that you are a liar too.
Nope.You need help? Sure: argumentum ad hominem, is 'where an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself':
For this to be true, you'd need to have: a) An argument. b) Something worth rebutting. c) (My) Intent to to do so. Neither one is the case, especially not a and b. 
There is no reason to answer this way unless desperately trying to distract from the actual substance.
To distract from the fact that you're a butthurt troll that needs to be banned? Now why would I want to do that? 
Gibberish quoted. Let us know when you are back to the substance.
Again, attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself:
you're a butthurt troll
Reminder:
Allowing stuff like this is just damaging for everyone [...] and ultimately the forum (which is already in a bad state)
-->The above poster (LAUDA) is a good example of people that continue to be here despite having been caught in illegal schemes: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0
Tell us: extortionists/criminals do NOT hurt the forum? What right does a criminal have to play the police here? Make sure to post a valid reply.