Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ICO] LOCI Thinking Better. Together.
by
jackjeffreys
on 09/10/2017, 13:21:18 UTC
The USPTO offers a free search engine, what is wrong with it?

To answer your question I am going to use the words of the US patent office’s.

Below is the intro for the USPTO  seven steep process to conduct a patent search using there system.

This is a Seven Step Strategy for conducting preliminary searches of U.S. patents and
PTRCs provide online access to the PatFT (Patents Full-Text and Image)
and AppFT (Applications Full-Text and Image) databases on the USPTO website
 and the Espacenet Worldwide Database on the EPO website.
In addition, most PTRCs provide access to additional USPTO patent databases
available through PubWEST (Public version of the Web-based Examiners Search Tool)
and PubEAST (Public version of the Examiners Assisted Search Tool).
The USPTO has transitioned from 100 year old U.S. Patent Classification (USPC) system
 to Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC),).
The USPTO currently only uses CPC for classifying new utility patent documents;
it will continue to use U.S. Patent Classification for classifying design and plant patents.

Let me tell you, it only gets more convoluted from there. Do you see the problem?






Yea that is a bit obnoxious.
What about Google didn’t they come out with a Patent Search Engine?

Yes, In 2006 Google took their book search engine

and set it loose within a patent database going back to 1790 for the US and 1978 for Europe.

 Then they kept working on it, updating it, adding country after country.

They integrated Google Scholar and google Books, along with all kinds of tools.

 Today it is the best FREE search engine out there,

and a complete waste of time