I see you've been bragging about those 10 btc in escrow, but let's see if it DOES actually make sense: assuming you are a new market player and so have a relatively small amount of customers, your cap of simultaneously mixed coins is 100 btc (for simplicity) and that's where exit scam happens (for whatever reason, we are just assuming here). And let's say there were 100 people where everyone was mixing a single coin, which means that if the escrow will be WILLING to collaborate and allocate funds proportionally then everyone gets 0.1 btc.
Does only for me this thing look ridiculous and proves absolutely nothing? Keep in mind that we have an optimistic 1 to 10 ratio here (escrow/mixer), so if the real turnover is higher than you'll probably get like a few satoshis or so from the escrow.
Good luck with establishing trust but imo this is not the right way of doing it.
1:10 ratio for
BTC10 and
BTC100, yes, it is not balanced.
But the thing is; everyone is free to mix small amount several times if they are doubting a mixing service, not only this one (does not intend to defend this site). But, a mixer service actually doesn't need to escrow funds, in this case just for insurance but you said
this is not the right way of doing it? Maybe you should mentioned about the right way to do it. There is another mixing service which doesn't escrow their funds at all, only based on their trust in this forum. On the other hand, every mixing service could manage to collect fees from all of transactions which is profitable without have to scam people, trust is more valuable than
BTC1 at a time or
BTC10 in different time frame
how many times has it already been mentioned? the same way as the original service did