Theoretically casino bets are more risky than the sport betting. In a dice game the probability of getting a number is very less than what happened in sport betting. And also in a casino game there is a house edge which you can not defeat. But in sport betting there is no such things.
I think, even practically casino bets are more risky than sports bets as most of the casino games involve no type of skill. Almost, every one of them is pure luck. Slots, roulette, and dice have no strategies of winning due to the previous mentioned fact. Even poker player needs good cards if he wants to win and only good luck can bring that to him. Sports bets can be won 90 percent of the time by using analytical skills.
I won't go against you in this matter. Casino games are far riskier and unpredictable as compare to the sports bets. They are impel most of the time while random games are like hitting the hanging object with eyes covered.
As far as I know, poker is the only casino game in which you get the opportunity to put on a real show and others are no fun at all.
I have no different opinion in this regard. With how much efficiency and accuracy can one predict the quick results of luck dependent games? It is zero and if someone guesses right then it simply means he was lucky that time. I am also a fan of poker and it is the only game that we can actually play unlike slots and dice which I used to play when I was a kid.