It is kind of weird that once we made GRouPcoin and DeVCoin the constant complaints about bitcoin NOT constantly creating coins seems to have died out.
Maybe all the people who claimed that it is economically vital to keep creating coins forever were just bullshitting?
It would be useful to have them around to re-interate all their arguments, explaining that coins such as GRouPcoin and DeVCoin that keep creating coins forever are far superior to the intrinsically flawed "limited number ever" model exemplified by bitcoin...
-MarkM-
Quite. Since first hearing of bitcoin I had been waiting for a change. Then gave up and stopped following developments and missed existence of groupcoin and devcoin. But I can assure you there are a lot of people out there who appreciate econ101, remain patient and know that btc in so far as achieving commonly heralded aims (which are not necessarily the same as those of its originators, another debateable matter) was doa.