Re: If Anarchy can work, how come there are no historical records of it working?

Ideas evolve. Regardless of what you want to achieve, acting superior to people who died centuries ago because you "know" what freedom is while they only knew the "illusion of freedom" is ridiculous.

As is pretending they were right. And again, I'm not discussing freedom. Never have been. Only consent, democracy, and taxation.

And we are back at my point about the evolution of ideas between the War of the Roses and the 1640s. Thanks for the diversion.

And we're back to my point of those ideas being wrong. No more and no less than an earth-centric solar system. And for many of the same reasons.

Irrelevant. If you want to discuss seventeenth century ideas and why they got it wrong, make a thread for it. Its nothing to do with the NewLiberty's question.

Aside from you presenting those flawed ideas as an answer.

Did you read the question? I say the ideas were evident in the 1640s in a way that they were not during the War of the Roses which implies they evolved in that period. That's debatable - I could be a decade or 2 out - but to call that assertion "flawed" is stupid.