Did you agree the idea of freedom from necessity can mean a guarantee of a strong minimal standard of living to all?
I agree that freedom
from necessity would mean a guarantee of a minimal standard of living to all.
I do not agree that
freedom includes a guarantee of a strong minimal standard of living to all.
The difference between those two statements is the difference in definition I was pointing out earlier in this thread.
Gotcha. So you
personally don't feel that freedom includes a guarantee of a strong minimal standard of living to all.
Incorrect. This isn't about my feelings. This is about the definition of freedom, and how I am not expanding that definition onto an abstraction, then removing the reference to that abstraction and calling it the definition. Is that more clear?
Here is an example:
Freedom from necessity would mean a guarantee of a minimal standard of living to all.
Freedom does not include a guarantee of a strong minimal standard of living to all.