Re: Ridiculous to send signed message to recover hacked account.
Why do you think I would know everything about this forum, just as why do you think you would know everything about my argument?
I will only know everything about this forum if I am the webmaster at the very least.
You would know a little bit more about me if you stop all your childish attitudes.
If you think bitcoin is itself not a shitcoin, then you are seriously more naive than you can ever realize.
If you think bitcoin and the rest are all shitcoin, then I suppose you have a mission here.
If you want to bark, make sure to bark at the right tree.
I am amazed that calling me an idiot that wasted time on unspecified shitcoin is on-topic.
If I were to do the same on you, my comment would have been deleted.
Yes, I understand the inherent bias in every human.
You think you are objective?
Of course you can say you are, just like everyone else does.
But then you would actually earn my respect if you admit that you are not, which is actually a challenge for people of your kind.
There is nothing wrong with requiring signed bitcoin messages as a solution.
There is everything wrong if legitimacy is totally dependent only on one single solution (as if there is no other solution that humans cannot think of).
You obviously have a challenge in understanding simple points of argument.
I am sorry.
I will only know everything about this forum if I am the webmaster at the very least.
You would know a little bit more about me if you stop all your childish attitudes.
Vitalik is a corporate sellout/idiot, yes.
If you think bitcoin is itself not a shitcoin, then you are seriously more naive than you can ever realize.
If you think bitcoin and the rest are all shitcoin, then I suppose you have a mission here.
If you want to bark, make sure to bark at the right tree.
The posts are on-topic. Ironically, now you're the one who is breaking the forum rules. 
I am amazed that calling me an idiot that wasted time on unspecified shitcoin is on-topic.
If I were to do the same on you, my comment would have been deleted.
Yes, I understand the inherent bias in every human.
You think you are objective?
Of course you can say you are, just like everyone else does.
But then you would actually earn my respect if you admit that you are not, which is actually a challenge for people of your kind.
There's nothing wrong with that. Actions have consequences, and consequences tend to be nice lessons when you fail to educate yourself on time. There's some much irony in here that it's almost funny.
There is nothing wrong with requiring signed bitcoin messages as a solution.
There is everything wrong if legitimacy is totally dependent only on one single solution (as if there is no other solution that humans cannot think of).
You obviously have a challenge in understanding simple points of argument.
I am sorry.