You have got to be kidding me. EOS is not even close to being a security. It promises nothing in return and is an open source software that will be released. You sure wasted a lot of words and don't even understand what EOS is.
The securities law is based on the profit expectations of investors, not what EOS writes in their legal documents which do not reflect the economic reality of the situation.
Open source does not help them avert the securities regulations, because for one thing they pooled the funds raised and are expected by investors to use those funds to develop the open source.
The investors expectations are proven by the comments in this thread. All the SEC has to do is capture this thread. Note I have archived this thread at archive.is to help the regulators.
As far as US buyers using VPN to get around getting EOS tokens, 99% of other ICO's have allowed the same loophole. They gave the same warnings with even stronger language discouraging US buyers
Nevertheless, the US buyers side-stepped the controls and thus EOS (i.e. blockone) has likely violated the law.
Disclaimer: IANAL. This is not legal advice.
Why the fuck then are you worrying and discussing and bitching about a subject on which you admittedly have neither expertise ie no fucking idea of what you are talking about nor any interest ie no money put on EOS?
Unlike you the Larimers know how to get shit done and put it out there for everyone to use, even knowing the theoretical risks they are taking in the undefined legal framework surrounding crypto right now.
What kind of incapable moron are you?
Or do you have a good excuse to explain your mental diarrhea type only activity on this forum? oh I have the feeling you must have a good one or two.