Re: [ANN] [REBOOT] CWXT- CRYPTOWORLDX- REBOOT/RELAUNCH-ADD MASTERNODES
Anyway, I would like the so-called devs to address the statement they made saying that they were never going to do masternodes.
So, for all of those who are paying attention, lest they get scammed by them in the ICO ...
1) The devs claim they will swap to masternodes and do a 3:1 coin swap, reducing the supply.
2) People buy on the promise of masternodes. Yay! Go masternodes!!!
3) After discovering the large "original" dev wallet, the devs announce they are going to instead do an ERC-20 token and not bother with the coin swap, because of unknown amount from the original pre-mine. There will be no swap at all, and you are SOL if you bought the coins on the old chain.
4) After complaining by some in the community, they say they will allow 25 more people (i.e. 300 total people on telegram, whereas they currently have 275) to be able to obtain an airdrop from the new ERC-20 tokens.
5) I say they promised masternodes at some point.
6) They say they never promised masternodes and point to their new plan (as of today even) that they will do this Proof of Hodling.
7) Some others are nice enough to point out devs' original statements so I didn't have to.
. Here we are again.
So who here who bought on the promise of masternodes wants to give their personally identifying information to these yahoos for an ERC-20 token?
I sure do not.
In addition, I would like what was promised: masternodes. Maybe we don't need this new team to go forward with this.
Finally devs : You're telling me that your team doesn't have the required skill sets to make a block explorer? How were you going to do a chain swap if you couldn't even manage that simple task?
So, for all of those who are paying attention, lest they get scammed by them in the ICO ...
1) The devs claim they will swap to masternodes and do a 3:1 coin swap, reducing the supply.
2) People buy on the promise of masternodes. Yay! Go masternodes!!!
3) After discovering the large "original" dev wallet, the devs announce they are going to instead do an ERC-20 token and not bother with the coin swap, because of unknown amount from the original pre-mine. There will be no swap at all, and you are SOL if you bought the coins on the old chain.
4) After complaining by some in the community, they say they will allow 25 more people (i.e. 300 total people on telegram, whereas they currently have 275) to be able to obtain an airdrop from the new ERC-20 tokens.
5) I say they promised masternodes at some point.
6) They say they never promised masternodes and point to their new plan (as of today even) that they will do this Proof of Hodling.
7) Some others are nice enough to point out devs' original statements so I didn't have to.
. Here we are again.So who here who bought on the promise of masternodes wants to give their personally identifying information to these yahoos for an ERC-20 token?
I sure do not.
In addition, I would like what was promised: masternodes. Maybe we don't need this new team to go forward with this.
Finally devs : You're telling me that your team doesn't have the required skill sets to make a block explorer? How were you going to do a chain swap if you couldn't even manage that simple task?
Masternodes themselves, are not possible on ETH, so we are utilizing the exact same payout structuring and titling the smart contract concept as proof-of-hodl . Just like a masternode, if you hold the required amount - you are eligible for the extra staking(HODLing) rewards.This will proceed on the new eth chain. There will be no overall difference to the set up than it would have been on a seperate blockchain as originally planned with a swap out. We cannot engage our swap out as originally planned. We did not bother to develope a block explorer as we did not plan to proceed to utilize CWXT after the swap. A community member offered to assist to save us time and was having issues getting it to sync - due to the original dev remove portion of the source code. We had everything set up to engage a token swap up until the discovery of token centralization when a user was finally able to detect the problem with the explorer. We are proceed accordingly given the circumstances.
I would like to point out that your previous post doesn't address the fact that you made claims about masternodes in the past. You completely gloss over what I asked for in my post and state what you are currently doing. I get what you are currently doing. And it's not what you originally said when you announced a relaunch. Own up to it.
I understand Masternodes are not possible on the Ethereum platform. When you initially announced a re-launch, you said masternodes with a 3:1 swap. You never said that this would be a token swap onto the Ethereum platform. You never said there would be an ICO.
Obviously, this changed in the last few days.
However, that doesn't excuse the fact that many people bought the CWXT token expecting a token swap. Now there is no token swap and those who bought CWXT are left bagholding.
Let's take a step back and see how this looks for newcomers to the community, especially when it comes to the fake block explorer.
There are very easy ways for you to accommodate those who bought coins and to do the swap to your new ERC-20 token (which is now to be ICO'ed when previously it was promised you wouldn't do that).
It's quite simple. Actually create a block explorer. None of this 'some member of the community created a scammy block explorer and we are concerned about the amounts that are in this one address' BS. If the other block explorer doesn't work properly, how do you know that there are all those coins to be worried about in the original developer's address?
Please answer my question regarding the block explorer. If it's fake, then how do you know those coins exist or are a problem?
In short, you do not know, so don't use it as an excuse to do a scammy ICO.