The big bang has evidence supporting it
what we call the universe is something that we have described with observational evidence,
Psychic powers have been described with observational evidence.
Survival has evidence to support it.
The universe is based on consciousness, this means that philosophical materialism is incorrect.
You can claim they have but they haven't. We don't have a telekinesis theory as far as I know. If there was indeed observational evidence we would have discovered and studied long ago, we would have a ton of applications for it, we would have special schools teaching it, yet in real life there is nothing like that. Ghosts are also described with observational evidence (allegedly) do you believe in ghosts? Demons? Wake up to reality.
I provided the evidence, you only provided your beliefs.
Survival is a viable theory, same with Orch OR. Materialism is not viable. You did not explain the evidence using science or reason.
For those who are new to all of this:
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170215-the-strange-link-between-the-human-mind-and-quantum-physicsNo, I'm not a scientist. If there was enough evidence then we would have a scientific theory of your beliefs, there is no survival scientific theory for magic, as far as I know, if you show it to me then I will believe you. You claim what you have is evidence but it's not, all those tests are flawed, personal experiences and can't be repeated. Again if there was sufficient evidence scientists would have made a scientific theory, you are trying to convince people that magic is real in a bitcoin forum, off topic section in a thread that is called ''scientific proof of god'' You are desperate to feel validated by others so you can still believe in what you believe.