Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: If Anarchy can work, how come there are no historical records of it working?
by
myrkul
on 01/06/2013, 15:42:55 UTC
^ Cherry-picked quotes from favoured figures of authority =  Roll Eyes
I'd point out that Dr. Paul agrees with my understanding of freedom. Mayor Giuliani seems to be more in your camp.
Nope. "Freedom or slavery, Democrat or Republican -- pick one or the other." That's what you keep saying.
Find an actual quote where I say anything of the sort.
OK.
So, only an agrarian, matrilinear society is truly free?

You have a very limited world-view.

Right back to where I started.
While you don't literally ask people to choose between freedom and slavery, your various posts such as that one, convey the message that you're stuck with an insatiable freedom-lust. The blue team keeps winning, but you want the red team! Cry You never seem to ask yourself: "why do I want this 'freedom' so badly anyway? It's not a tangible item, it's just a made-up concept that all my favourite authors/politicians seem to use in order to convince me that I'm a 'slave' and manipulate me into supporting some philanthropic cause of theirs." You're not thinking outside the square.
Do try and keep in mind that that quoe was in response to this:
Anarchy is the non-patriarchal, non-monogamous, autark, selfsufficient, matrilineal community, which is not taxed and dominated by masters, rulers, strangers.
It was his claim that only an agrarian, matrilinear society community could be free from oppression, not mine.