You don't understand that no one really cares accept for you, because your sense
of self depends on it. Your belief system may have now become your most worthy
attachment that needs dislodging before you can progress. If you cling to Buddha
or Vishnu, and feel you need to defend them, you have failed in your journey
before you have even packed your bags. You are oblivious of your own beliefs.

Give me proof that the Buddha is a rebel proxy.
Give me proof that Lord Vishnu was killed.


Intention is one of the most important parts of determining sin.

I already know that. You are saying what I know that you think I don't know despite already written about it. This is one example of your perceived bias.


As for you comment as to all criminals are criminals: this is incorrect. A person
who steals bread to feed the poor, is extremely different than a criminal who steals
money to feed their self enrichment. When both go before the judge, if the judge is
fair and just, he will judge them based on their individual intentions, and so in this
same way you will be judged at the end. Sin is not equally attributable, just as
sentences are diverse upon circumstance.

If a person commits a crime unintentionally, how can he be a criminal? You misinterpret my point.


I actually did not say that at all and it seems you do not understand anything at all.
Here is what I said "Most of the current communications are written purposely with
multiple meanings, each with entirely unrelated thoughts I am trying to convey.".
What that means is that at times, the message is unrelated to religion, and at other
times they are about religion. The fact that you do not understand what I have written
plainly above, means you are likely blinded by stupid and hate, or really do not care
because you are only trying to push an agenda that I have already learned long ago
and negated.

If what you try to say has variable meanings, then to me that variability itself is an invalidity to your input. A worthless coin that is ETH will be worth far more in the future. Where did you ever help anyone here by suggesting to buy ETH? In fact, your comment that PayPal will never accept bitcoin was ironically after PayPal accepted it. Honestly, your validity is questionable. If it is indeed defective, then you are not appreciated to spread your defects until they are properly repaired.


The way that you talk to me is evidence enough of your understandings and abilities.

And at the same time, you think your level is high? The relativity of a high/low level was first brought up by you in response to my comment. And since you like to play comparison game on who is better, I suppose I should join in. How high is your level in comparison to me can easily be judged by how much you understand my Dream-Dreamer analogy and Lord Vishnu's active dreaming that creates multiverse. If you cannot, you should admit you cannot. I would give you respect for being honest in your handicap.

You talked about the Entity as if it is the God. If so, then by right you should be clear there is no such thing as rebel/non-rebel in the eyes of such Entity.

If you are the real deal, then I would like to learn from you, regardless of my level and ego. But if you are not (clearly you are not), then I might as well discredit you for the fun of it.


Sci-Fi nonsense is essentially majority of the stories within the Mahabharata, so I
don't understand why you talk to me like this, knowing you are being hypocritical.
That would be intentionally sinning as you say, would it not? You are accusing me
of something that exists within your own belief system, yet ignore that aspect to
attack me on it.

If nothing can help me than so be it. Thanks for trying though.

You are making statements that have no evidence whatsoever to back them up. I am critical to those I understand to be a fraudster. Intentionally sinning? If I have sincere intention, then there is no sin. The fact that you are not even capable of seeing through my nature and yet casually talk about me intentionally sinning by making accusation about you is another example why I said your level is below mine.

Have you read that "Thinking and Destiny" and Nag Hammadi lost scriptures I recommended to you. I bet you have never read them. Please don't give fraudulent statements about them until you have gone through them.