Re: [ANN] [ICO] [WGR] | Wagerr | The Betting Blockchain | Bounties
More on this and other interesting things in the coming update... 
There are some good arguments here on both sides. It's actually good having a balanced view.. On the one hand we have 1 person advising not to buy anymore and then another providing positives on the team regardless of setbacks.
In truth, the slack was getting a bit silly with the lambo talk. Atleast now people might be more inclined to watch what eventuates rather than blindly buying up.
Lotus you seem to know alot about the project, do you communicate regularly with dev's?
Yes I speak with David and some of the other team members on a day-to-day basis, and when that guy and a few other trolls says half the team left...it shows how little they even know about the project. Why anyone would believe these guys is just beyond me, unless they're looking for confirmation bias or something.
The "half" of the team he's saying that left was an advisor and a marketing guy, who was busy finishing up his degree currently. Their role was mainly for the pre-ICO and ICO anyway, and we've had far better replacements waiting for a few months now. Neither of these guys was anywhere even near essential to this project. We appreciate their work and they did an amazing job with the ICO, but this thing has grown to a scale that they would have trouble doing things alone and they had too much going on in their personal lives anyway to be able to continue to dedicate the time needed to this project.
The discord community has already met some of the new guys, especially the new advisors...and they are fairly happy with the choices. Most of them have been community members themselves since the ICO or even before, so they truly do understand things from the holders' point of view. The rest of the community will learn more about them during this next update I'm assuming, I can't spoil too much
These trolls know pretty much 0 about the gambling industry, or even about this project and its members it seems. You don't have to trust either of us, do your own research and watch for this next update...then you'll be able see who was more correct here.
Also as soon as the marketing guy left, one of these trolls here created a fake reddit account with his name and starting posting a ton of lies on the Wagerr subreddit and elsewhere. The real one got on to clear things up, but still it shows how desperate some of these people are to try and discredit this project with indirect or completely non-factual evidence and tactics. They're currently trying to run a negative campaign against us on /r/Cryptocurrency and pretty much anywhere else they can get away with it also. Since they can't/won't give other betting projects the same treatment, it's highly unfair and extremely biased...if you want unbiased info then try to research the project as objectively and thoroughly as possible.
Lastly, I'll try to check in here and answer questions and such whenever I have a bit of extra time.
I cannot discredit a proven project. I am only reading the series of events that happen and calling a spade as a spade.
Read the events to a 3rd party that has no skin in the game. Ask them to label them competent or incompetent. I dare you.
This guy is pretty much a paid shill or have so much in it that it has to succeed or he will be homeless. Don't make the same mistake as him.
If you really hate yourself and really believe in their mission then buy them when mainnet (not the Jan 15 useless one) with gambling gets a solid date. With b2x fork coming up you don't have to premature buy this failure.
To whoever say Bittrex. There is almost no way Bittrex will list this when they are trying to get into SEC compliance while wagerr in their own words is pretty much want to bypass any regulations.