I'd rather Reggie be out doing deals and what he thinks is best for the business, which makes sense given he runs it...
The VERI team could spend days putting together the most comprehensive FAQ, or full lengthy video refutations (which would mostly be going over old ground) the FUDsters wouldn't stop, if they're not disclosing who they are and why they're paying to spread FUD then they clearly have an agenda and won't stop regardless of circumstances. These FUDsters know very well that the order of magnitude to refute BS is much, much higher than it is to spread it, it's an effective tactic to waste a companies resources and time.
We all have to remember this is a private company, so unfortunately we can't be privy to everything going on, whilst it's possible we have good suggestions we'll never be able to see the full picture as opposed to those working on the inside, you either trust Reggie and the team to do what's best for the business with the resources at his disposal, or you don't.
If you have the will, you will find the way. Why do you think putting a comprehensive FAQ and a full length video to refute the FUD is a very costly and/or time-consuming thing to do? You are wrong. If the team is a fighter by quickly refuting any FUD, the FUDsters would quit. If you have already debunked their argument, they will not repeat the same FUD or else they will make themselves appear stupid. Waste company's resources? Reggie himself said his job is to talk. He should have spend more time countering all the FUDs more effectively and professionally.
A private company working in a blockchain industry that promotes transparency is actually looking for trouble eventually. I am not asking for transparency in ongoing negotiations. I am asking for transparency in some of the things that by reason and logic, he should be doing, i.e. do whitepaper, disclose team, refute FUD. Yeah, whitepaper. Every other ICOs have whitepaper and they are not stupid. JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs have no whitepaper because they are not in the blockchain industry doing ICOs.
I am a large holder of VERI and despite that, I dare to voice out my opinion as I see right and reasonable. People like some of you disagree with me because while you have VERI too, you are fearful of all the negative comments that will make the price go lower and suffer paper loss. I don't mind suffering paper loss if such loss is temporary on a foundation where everything is being done effectively. If you guys cannot handle my criticism, then you should not be holding any VERI. There were many members here in the past quick to say I am a FUDster, but today most of them are GONE! Sold off everything despite claiming to be a hodler. Nonsense. I am critical and yet I am still holding. In terms of being objective, I dare say my objectivity far exceed many others.