Maybe they should make Forking a little stricter, like getting 30+% community support before forking, losing all or part of their Bitcoin when they move over to other fork or simply put a limit on the number of allowed fork in a given period. Stuff like this can't be possible in the real world : you can't reject something and still have stake in it.
Thank Goodness I am not taking part in the free coin madness, God forbid. I do not like them and they do not have too many values.
There's Bitcoin Platinum coming soon too:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2316571.msg23524756Hell, we got even Bitcoin Shit coming through too!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2316573.0And like I said, this is a good sign. Once there is a massive proliferation of forks, the relevancy of Bitcoin forks will be 0. Let these people create the announcement threads and make a mockery of forks, it is a public service for Bitcoin. The more the general public learns forks are a scam unless they have unanimous support, the better.