Maybe they should make Forking a little stricter, like getting 30+% community support before forking, losing all or part of their Bitcoin when they move over to other fork or simply put a limit on the number of allowed fork in a given period. Stuff like this can't be possible in the real world : you can't reject something and still have stake in it.
Thank Goodness I am not taking part in the free coin madness, God forbid. I do not like them and they do not have too many values.
There's Bitcoin Platinum coming soon too:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2316571.msg23524756Hell, we got even Bitcoin Shit coming through too!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2316573.0And like I said, this is a good sign. Once there is a massive proliferation of forks, the relevancy of Bitcoin forks will be 0. Let these people create the announcement threads and make a mockery of forks, it is a public service for Bitcoin. The more the general public learns forks are a scam unless they have unanimous support, the better.
Agree! With this new trend or hype, upcoming forks will not be a big deal anymore.
So, let them create such a "trash" altcoin extracted from bitcoin's name.
And people later on will wake up to the reality that, they don't have to worry anymore with this upcoming forks and let just sit their
BTCs' wherever they are supposed to be.