I do not see that core's has any tenable objection to 2X.
[1] Tech has moved on, 2mb is not that big, HD space and bandwidth are much cheaper
[2] BCH has proved you can go bigger blocks and have significant value network, and BCH network has not collapsed.
[3] It provides choice as to on chain or of chain transactions
[4] there is no such thing as spam in the network, but I will use the word "spam" as shorthand for transactions person A does not like.
[5] If you say go 8 times the blocksize and 1/2 the price for fees it will be 4 times more costly to "spam" a block while providing much lower fees. Given there are limited bitcoins, the spammer will run out of BTC to spam.
I welcome any discussion as why I am in error, but as it stand to not 2x then a few years later 4x and so on, seem in bad faith by core. It forces the question cui bono?
On your point 2, yeah anon miners mining empty blocks in significant value i suppose. Only think BCH has proved is no one cares for BTC forks. They are just another shit coin to most of us. Also, if you guys already have big blocks in BCH, why don't you go party there. Shouldn't this be simple. Big blockers got BCH and we got BTC. So now you want another big block fork!!?