Well on this thread you're the one banging on the pulpit.
I never said I wasn't, it's myrkul who needs to defend this absurd claim that the rest of 'you' and 'Austrians' broadly are not operating out of a moralistic framework that rationalizes usury by defining the lender as morally virtuous and the borrower as morally flawed.
Economics is value-free. Borrowers are not "bad" and savers are not "good". If you want to argue about "usury", do it in the religious section.