Welp, I think it's a good idea to do this. however I don't think someone who owns a gambling site should be thebone doing this as he/she might be biased.
biased to what?
I agree...
This is the same as Marlboro establishing foundation "Let's stop lung cancer"

That's just definition of Conflict of interests:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interestsorry but I cant agree with this comparison. lets say primedice is using the perfect Provably Fair solution and asking all casinos to add the same perfect Provably Fair solution what would be wrong with this or biased?
how many perfect Provably Fair solutions are out there?
to be frank I am not an expert of PF but I always wanted to see that the PF solution is done the way that a player can verify his bets after his session and it should not matter if the player's session was 1 bet or thousands of bets or more. to change client seed for each bet is not good for players and is not good for casino OPs