The notion of capital relies on the assertion that "this capital is mine and nobody else's.
This statement is false. Many of the modern legal/corporate structures are finely grained in their differences in specifying both the possession and control of the
collectively owned and maintained capital of the company.
Using convoluted legalese, some of the "its mine" can appear to be mitigated. In actuality, capital is still withheld from use by those who might use it.
Appropriation by a workforce, for example, interferes with that assertion.
Only in the sense that said appropration is by force, against the will or consent of those with a prior claim to that capital. We do have corporate structures that are specificly designed to limit corporate ownership to present and/or former members of the corporate workforce.
That prior claim is invalid and based on imperialism. The workforce has only force to use. Any basic understanding of union politics wlll show this.
Can any sort of noncoersive strategy (private police, chains, higher limit on
wages) be used by the capitalist to maintain control?
Can a capitalist enply non-coercive methods to maintain control of his capital? Yes. But the strawman you set up above should be set alight, because those are all examples of
coercive methods. Just because the cops are private thugs doesn't make it a non-coercive solution.
The strawman belongs to anarchocapitalists, not me.
Control of private capital requires violent defense.
Using robots makes the question moot. In the meantime, we still have the employee/wage slave archetype toiling away, wasting life, in the real world.
How are you going to afford the service robot?
With my liberated community capital. Capital is not bad, capitalism is bad.
I'd like for you to explain the shortcomings of Anarchism without modifiers compared to an anarchism that utilizes a heirarchy of ownership in a way that justifies the extra ten letters.
Good God, where do you people come up with this crap?
Derp.
Anarchism has lots of variants. some oppose others. Some are misnomers.