This response couldn't be further from the truth. The reason for a hard fork is an attempt to propose an improvement to the Bitcoin (and its blockchain). A success would lead to a better "bitcoin" and a failure proves that the a majority of bitcoin miners believe that is good as it is.
I'm not sure if you're stupid or trolling. The person is talking about contentious forks, which are inherently not Bitcoin, and create additional altcoins hence the forking coins in the title. A contentious hard fork can never be an improvement of any kind to Bitcoin, regardless of what it brings, as it creates a diverging chain.No. It could offer a benifit, that's why a fork is proposed. Roger Ver hasn't had influence in all forks, so stopping talking shit!
Again, you either didn't read or understand the thread.It's quite funny that you think that you have the capacity to correct me on some statements regarding Bitcoin. Then again, sig. spam it is.
