So this last block (492,961), why is the size 998,181kb while most of the previous blocks were over 1MB and had more transaction fees. I have noticed most other miners are minting blocks over 1MB and wanted to see if Kano is limited.
492,963 BTC.com 1,047,123 14.98159913 BTC right now 0000000000000000001bc14d31cd78cba9af69b4ef9af8fac9f3aabb260658de NYA
492,962 AntPool 1,050,617 15.56937734 BTC 2 minutes ago 0000000000000000001e04433a329abe9308ce304f64da81e8ec1c9d3522308b BU NYA
492,961 KanoPool 998,181 14.89274489 BTC 17 minutes ago 00000000000000000087d0ce2bf34d1d79e1c8f063e59aee4cbe14bc3786aa45
492,960 Bixin 1,059,700 15.27128605 BTC 18 minutes ago 0000000000000000008575829b29042db38bb25d89258cfed7bfc79cea5c144e NYA
As others have stated, it's because the block was 1 minute after the prior one. "short" blocks tend to have less transaction fees.
Have a look at some of the prior blocks, referencing the block history on Kano's website, and you'll see the "longer" blocks tend to be very "fat" with transaction fees.
M
EDIT: like the most recent one for 14.89274489. That's 2.39274489 BTC in fees.
you can scroll back through the history of every block we have found, that none of the blocks are over 988.01kb in size.
I guess the question they are asking is what are these >1MB blocks and how come we aren't mining any when other pools are?
However, I don't see these big >1MB blocks on blockexplorer as they are seeing them.