The one thing you know is that full blocks are bringing much profit for miners than not filled blocks. On the other hand, the Bitcoin developer team want to remain the block size and not bigger blocks while a part of bitcoin community wants bigger blocks. In the next fork, the altcoin B2X brings bigger blocks and the SegWit functionality remains.
Yes absolutely correct but why the dev team donot want to increase the block size to 2mb and why are they opposing.
i can understand that it may not be a permannet solution but it will solve the current situaltion.
And after some time we can move to 3mb size and so on.
I see the 1MB block size (now, max block-weight under SegWit) as a
Schelling point. As soon as you grant the principle that the block size can be changed, then it can be changed again and again, in which case, it is the same as having no block size limit at all. But we already know that having no block size limit is bad for a lot of reasons - it will cause centralization of the network, it will degrade service, it will attract an unlimited amount of lint and cruft into the blockchain, and can even be used to orchestrate DoS attacks on the network. So, the line has to be drawn somewhere. 1MB (that is, max block-weight) is that line.