When an owner doesnt use a thing, the thing is defacto abandoned.
I see. So, if I'm not in my car, it's abandoned? If I've gone off to work for the day, my house is abandoned? If I let you borrow my car for the week, it's abandoned? If you house-sit for me for the weekend, it's abandoned?
If you oppose the NON AGGRESSION principle, that makes you aggressive pretty much by definition, doesn't it?
lol
According to yer zany capitalist revisionist rhetoric nonsense grasping fer straws reasoning, whatever.
Try nonviolence.
Works just fine if everyone is nonviolent. But if you refuse to
defend yourself, you're just handing your life over to the aggressor.
I see a problem here: "defense" can be interpreted pretty broadly (e.g. "preventive strike", "we had to disable their capabilities to attack us"). Is this instruction only meant for the individual or does it extend to some group the inidividual might be part of?
I enjoyed your earlier discussion with blablabla, btw.