In practice, what you describe is the exception to the rule within a state capitalist framework. Dependency on employers prevents many from ever coming far enough out of debt to do what they want.
I have a hard time with equating pay to exoneration or choice because reliance on any paycheck does not let you all the way out of the state or capitalist's control.
Pay is to coercion as exoneration is to execution. This does not in any way suggest that pay is equal to exoneration.
Pay is merely a civil agreement to perform for compensation so no it does not let you all the way out of state control, this is not its promises.
However it very well may put you all the way out of any particular capitalist's control, if by control you really mean enticement.
In jobs that can teach you something, you might as well be an intern.
Interns generally don't even get the fish for a day, the daily pay of the unskilled cabin boy is a better deal for the cabin boy. Your priorities are screwed.
The civil agreement put forth by employers is the only option for toilers unless you can figure out how to thrive outside of it (which we should).
I know how, and my children will know also; but subsistance farming isn't a preferable lifestyle to most. Specialization is for insects, but free trade
always improves the lifestyles of those who freely engage in it. And yes, I can prove that.
http://desertislandgame.com/
I don't consider the fishermen slaves. That's a fantastic example of how mutual aid works. Captaining a ship with a crew is a-ok by me, yo.
Capitalist pig!