A) Stop working for one of the accused.
It could be just as easy to say you work for the accused, competition. It would be a great way to drive traffic to those other sites.
Discrediting the competition has been used for decades.
"I'm not saying he's a thief or a liar but why would he hide his full identity and home address otherwise? I just find it very suspicious that an innocent person would do something like that."
I'd venture a guess that anyone who was serious about decrying scams would put effort into providing evidence, and that only someone who was paid by a competitor would be so lazy. If op disagrees with my opinion of him, then he is wrong because I say so.
Dude what are you so anal about exactly? Don't like it? Open your own damn thread, what's so hard to understand.
A) Stop working for one of the accused.
It could be just as easy to say you work for the accused, competition. It would be a great way to drive traffic to those other sites.
Discrediting the competition has been used for decades.
"I'm not saying he's a thief or a liar but why would he hide his full identity and home address otherwise? I just find it very suspicious that an innocent person would do something like that."
I refuse to believe you are this thick skulled, I take it as positive proof of you being associated with one of the accused.